Debate on the Impacts of Attacks on Two-Point Texts and Government Intervention in Financial Markets

We discuss the arguments against imposing attacks on two-point texts, such as the crucial role of transaction costs in innovative and new financial instruments. The opponents argue that such attacks negatively impact the innovation process and financial instruments. Skeptics also question the visibility and effectiveness of the attacks, as technological advancement and information and communication markets allow traders to circumvent any tax or tax legislation. The experience indicates that if there is government intervention, markets and institutions often try to avoid the burdens of this intervention. Tax evasion depends on whether the public is convinced that the tax is normal and necessary for market performance, otherwise the evasion process will begin. Those who are skeptical of government intervention argue that it often leads to distortion in the markets, which ultimately hinders overall efficiency, and can create domino effects, causing further complications and disruption in the economy.